Interest in International cricket

[GA-James018]

Okay I'm gonna stop assuming. It could be interesting to make a poll and see how many people prefer "separate fatigue systems no prizemoney" or "keep current system, get prizemoney" because that tends to be the practical issue.

I like this idea.

[Cottonball]

Thats always the sticking point, people want to keep their players and get the compensation too

lol at people just wanting the best of both worlds - for me it reduces realism and managerial awareness if players are available for clubs despite being called up for international fixtures

[heppa]

A poll would be interesting. I personally think the NAT scene adds another enjoyable managing element. It can be frustrating but an enjoyable aspect to juggle.

Either way, I think rather than kill off NTs, we're better off finding ways to get more managers interested.

[GA-PowerBug]

If we kill off NATs we do it right now so that UAE are forever the reigning World Cup champions

--------------------------------------

NATs is fringe when it comes to FTP, it probably always will be a fringe part of FTP. And that's okay. If FTP as a whole is healthy and growing then the NAT involvement will also grow.

I also believe part of the reason behind lack of numbers when election time arrives is due to how many elections are somewhat known in advance once someone established runs. And whilst the overall game numbers are where they are you can't really force your way in, there's not enough votes to go around.