I thought it would be nice to have some lines with reviews in it even though we don't have them
I could remove the one that says we don't hae reviews too I guess
To review or not to review
-
- CAPT
- Posts: 24109
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: Look...up in the sky
- Contact:
Re: To review or not to review
Master Crowfan of the Blessed Spreadsheet
GarageTM Foundation Member
GarageTM Foundation Member
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 am
- Location: Reception
Re: To review or not to review
That's the only issue with the line.xhogaux wrote:I know there's an LBW line that goes along the lines of the batter channeling his inner watson and asks for the review and the umpire says there aren't any reviews here, so I can imagine it would be stupid to show both lines in the same match. Also hypothetically every single dot ball could use this line, that also would look stupid. I don't think any commentary should involve a review like this as it opens up a rather large can of worms38.2 . Swain to Costigan : Big appeal for LBW by Swain as everyone else joins in. It looks very close but the umpire says not out. They've called for the review and it looks to have struck him just outside the line, no more there a millimetre in it. So it stays not out. There is a fine line between pleasure and pain.
"Dunder Mifflin, This is Pam."