From The Pavilion

Jfam4 wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 19, 2019 3:16 am

Is there a forum for general questions and insights into different aspects of the game?
Exchanging of experience and opinions one might say?

kiwi2011 wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:01 am

Any update on the games starting late?
Or more specific the commentary starting three minutes after stated times ?
Releasing cloud figures and scorecard at -15 minutes to game times is also part of the equation

tonk6464 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:28 am

Firstly, thanks Crowie and the new admin team for all the hard work you've done to keep this game running. Great work.

Would you consider a change to the NAT system that would allow players to be selected for NAT tours and be available to play for their clubs at the same time?

Having key players unavailable in NAT tour weeks is a significant challenge to club teams and it's getting harder to manage now as there don't seem to be nearly as many high quality older players on the market these days that can be brought in to replace touring NAT players. I know people can contact the NAT managers and request their players not be selected but I'm reluctant to do that as I don't want to deprive NAT managers of some of their best players. I would love to see NAT players be available for both club and country.

MD-Summit wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:57 am

tonk6464 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:28 am

Firstly, thanks Crowie and the new admin team for all the hard work you've done to keep this game running. Great work.

Would you consider a change to the NAT system that would allow players to be selected for NAT tours and be available to play for their clubs at the same time?

Having key players unavailable in NAT tour weeks is a significant challenge to club teams and it's getting harder to manage now as there don't seem to be nearly as many high quality older players on the market these days that can be brought in to replace touring NAT players. I know people can contact the NAT managers and request their players not be selected but I'm reluctant to do that as I don't want to deprive NAT managers of some of their best players. I would love to see NAT players be available for both club and country.

Something that can be discussed.

MD-Summit wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:57 am

tonk6464 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:28 am

Firstly, thanks Crowie and the new admin team for all the hard work you've done to keep this game running. Great work.

Would you consider a change to the NAT system that would allow players to be selected for NAT tours and be available to play for their clubs at the same time?

Having key players unavailable in NAT tour weeks is a significant challenge to club teams and it's getting harder to manage now as there don't seem to be nearly as many high quality older players on the market these days that can be brought in to replace touring NAT players. I know people can contact the NAT managers and request their players not be selected but I'm reluctant to do that as I don't want to deprive NAT managers of some of their best players. I would love to see NAT players be available for both club and country.

Something that can be discussed.

Kaidus wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:04 am

MD-Summit wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:57 am

tonk6464 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:28 am

Firstly, thanks Crowie and the new admin team for all the hard work you've done to keep this game running. Great work.

Would you consider a change to the NAT system that would allow players to be selected for NAT tours and be available to play for their clubs at the same time?

Having key players unavailable in NAT tour weeks is a significant challenge to club teams and it's getting harder to manage now as there don't seem to be nearly as many high quality older players on the market these days that can be brought in to replace touring NAT players. I know people can contact the NAT managers and request their players not be selected but I'm reluctant to do that as I don't want to deprive NAT managers of some of their best players. I would love to see NAT players be available for both club and country.

Something that can be discussed.

Nah, no thanks. Please leave it as it is otherwise in most 1.1's you'll have someone who doesn't play the game for years, just sits and collects cash, then buys a monster side and storms the leagues. The one advantage regular players who go homegrown/build a side up is that these type of teams can't storm the leagues cos they have three games where they have to take into account player unavailability. Take that away and you'll have the same teams winning everything, and other players getting demoralised as it becomes a "who has the most cash to buy the best" game.

Kaidus wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:04 am

MD-Summit wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:57 am

tonk6464 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:28 am

Firstly, thanks Crowie and the new admin team for all the hard work you've done to keep this game running. Great work.

Would you consider a change to the NAT system that would allow players to be selected for NAT tours and be available to play for their clubs at the same time?

Having key players unavailable in NAT tour weeks is a significant challenge to club teams and it's getting harder to manage now as there don't seem to be nearly as many high quality older players on the market these days that can be brought in to replace touring NAT players. I know people can contact the NAT managers and request their players not be selected but I'm reluctant to do that as I don't want to deprive NAT managers of some of their best players. I would love to see NAT players be available for both club and country.

Something that can be discussed.

Nah, no thanks. Please leave it as it is otherwise in most 1.1's you'll have someone who doesn't play the game for years, just sits and collects cash, then buys a monster side and storms the leagues. The one advantage regular players who go homegrown/build a side up is that these type of teams can't storm the leagues cos they have three games where they have to take into account player unavailability. Take that away and you'll have the same teams winning everything, and other players getting demoralised as it becomes a "who has the most cash to buy the best" game.

tonk6464 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:24 am

Someone who builds up a huge stack of cash can buy up a whole squad of great players (including very good non-NAT reserves) and dominate the leagues already under the current system.